Not being negative ottoman. Constructive ("further assistance") surely?
I'm only raising a relevant point. That is pointing out a major obstacle that he has in his way that he may not have thought of. Lets not give the chap false (negative?) hope. That is what I think you are all doing, allbeit all of it well intended.
I would guess not having the car in your possession that you are complaining about and - looking for compensation for, was a pretty important point in any negotiations.
I just can't see a car manufacturer dealing with a claim on a 2nd hand car sold without warranty, not through a main dealer or even a dealer but sold privately.
As I said to Chris good luck. I will be interested to hear If he is successful.
I agree. It is a long shot; but I'm hoping that the history of the car will make a difference (and I don't even know the history but.... £5,800 spent on it in 13 months???).
I can see reason in being ultra-doubtful but not completely hopeless. Here we have (my own assumptions) a young pater familias
, who bought a family car in good faith and the car is robbing his family of a substantial amount of money and will do so for the next 2 or 3 years, although he won't even have it any more.
I feel so mortified about this that if I could afford it, I'd give him the money myself and be happy that I could afford it. And I don't even know the gentleman. So, since I feel this way about it, I see nothing wrong with encouraging him to put pen to paper and try and find out if Renault really care about their customers and whether they have done the right thing by him in this case. After all, there are 10,000+ members on this site and they might wish to know how Renault applies its expounded philosophies of putting the customer first.
I am in no way criticising anything you have said Rodders my friend, but if I had known earlier about all the problems Chris has been facing, maybe I would have been able to encourage him to take some other avenue before the car became too old to influence
. I can only apologise for not spotting his posts before. As I understand it, if the car is under 5 yrs old (maybe 4yrs and 364 days?),
seniors will look seriously at the situation and there are some men/women of integrity and initiative among all those whose job it is to turn down whatever requests are put to them.
And I agree with you that, the fact that he has already contracted to sell the car and won't have it for any length of time, is an immense hurdle in his path.
I hope my initial style of writing (that you apparently objected to) does not influence you into thinking badly of me because I really feel for this man. Too bad if he gets nothing back, but at least he won't blame himself for not even trying. Maybe if you get a chance to read the posts by mpbmpbmpb and Jonathan you will see that a hopeless case is sometimes not as hopeless as first perceived. If these two hadn't received encouragement and a little guidance from members of our community, maybe they would have seen it as a lost cause (as a matter of fact they had, initially).
The game ain't won or lost until the final whistle blows... ask Bayern Munich and Man United.
Best Wishes, as always,