As the subject says, have any of you ever had cause to claim against the AA?
Somed of you may have seen some of my recent tale of woe re my phantom
failure and all the subsequent investigations to get my car running again.
For those who haven't:
Last Sunday, London to Brum and back all good 50MPG
Monday afternoon tried to start the car for the first time since getting back with no luck. It seemed there was no fuel, but otherwise turning over fine.
Called out the AA to try for some free diagnostics/advice (My AA is provided by my bank)
AA man did no diagnostics, removed air inlet pipe from manifold and sprayed quantities of injector cleaner directly into the manifold while instructimg me to continually tuen over engine.
Car eventually started but with an apparent misfire, so he kept it running at 3K RPM.
Suddenly engine ran out of control at 5-6K RPM and seemed to run on, producing huge clouds of smelly blue smoke. I stalled the car and he said,
seals had gone.
Interim diagnostics showed only O2 sensor fault.
So off to garage for new
and related gubbins, only to find same symptoms upon completion.
After much good feedback from here tried replacing
sensor, no change.
Paid for mobile mechanic with Renault Clip diagnostics in his van to look and he says fuel pump.
Now I in private may admit that I should not always act on the advice of others, but as a non mechanic I am in a position where I have to accept the expert advice of those who place themselves on that position.
The AA state only that there patrol did what he felt was correct and accept no responsibility for any repairs that may be carried out on his advice.
My question is this, did he not create the symptoms himself in the first place?
Did he by trying to force the car to start, having failed to carry out any diagnostics, potentially cause damage or at least false symptoms through his actions?
Is it true that spraying quantities of injector cleaner into a cranking/running diesel engine is potentially dangerous?
I need to get as much info/expert opinion/evidence as I intend to claim against the AA for losses as a result of his actions and the subsequent unnecessary repairs carried out as a result.
OK, it turns out there are a lot of questions in there, but I do feel that he is at least partly responsible for the subsequent costs.
I am in danger of rambling so will stop here and leave it to anyone who has any good ideas/advice for me.
Thanks in advance.