Join Date: Jul 2006
Nominated 11 Times in 37 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 17
Thanked 2,467 Times in 1,851 Posts
I've often pondered whether MOT's should be based on mileage as well as age.
Let's face it, the average company car can clock up well into six figures before its old enough to be tested - and you'd expect the tyres & brakes to have been replaced more than a couple of times - but there's no 'need' to check until its 3 years old.
Parts wear out as much through use as through age - don't they?
Conversely, a car bought new for taxi purposes must be tested every six months from the date of licensing. (yet its still the owner/operator who'd be prosecuted over defects).
It seems the law only really favours paying passengers.
I fully support the principle of the MOT, as I believe it saves a great many lifes.
This job should never be complete - the day I think I've done it all, is the day I resign.
Currently in VelSatisfied's garage:
2005 FIAT Ducato 2.8JTD LWB Gran Volume, 2000 Kawasaki ZZR 1100 D7 'fullpower' in black + full GIVI & KAPPA luggage, 2007 MB R-Class 320 CDi Sport LWB uprated by Brabus to 300Bhp don't know if there's a 155mph limiter - will be fun finding out! 2004 Mercedes Vaneo 1.7 CDi Ambiente 7-seater