Independent Renault Forums banner

1 - 13 of 13 Posts

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
499 Posts
This was also on there.

Sex with dead deer not illegal, lawyer argues
Wisconsin case hinges on definition of 'animal'
By Lester Haines → More by this author
Published Friday 17th November 2006 16:20 GMT

The defence lawyer of a Wisconsin man charged with having sex with a dead deer is claiming he's innocent of any wrongdoing - because a "crimes against sexual morality" statute prohibits sex with animals, but fails to mention carcasses, The Duluth News Tribune reports.
Bryan James Hathaway, 20, of Superior, was arrested on "a misdemeanour charge of sexual gratification with an animal" after indulging in intercourse with said deceased deer on 11 October.
His attorney, public defender Fredric Anderson, last week filed a motion with a Douglas County court which argued "because the deer was dead, it was not considered an animal and the charge should be dismissed". He wrote: "The statute does not prohibit one from having sex with a carcass."
He further argued that, according to Webster's dictionary, an animal is "any of a kingdom of living beings". If you include carcasses in that definition, Anderson reasoned, "you really go down a slippery slope with absurd results".
Anderson demanded that a judge clarify "what the Legislature intended 'animal' to mean in the statute", insisting: "And the only clear point to draw the line in that definition, I believe, is the point of death."
Assistant district attorney James Boughner countered by saying that the court could indeed use a dictionary to determine the meaning of a word, but isn't obliged to do so. He told Judge Michael Lucci that "when a person's pet dog dies, the person still refers to the dog as his or her dog, not a carcass".
"It stays a dog for some time," Boughner added, noting that Hathaway himself had referred to the dead deer as exactly that, and not a carcass, when confronted by police.
Brougher concluded by stating the "statute was on punishing the human behaviour, not protecting animals".
"It does not seem to draw a line between the living and the dead," he noted. Interpreting the statue to exclude carcasses would, moreover, "also exclude freshly killed animals", Boughner insisted. This, in turn, "could lead to people who commit such acts with animals to kill them".
Boughner's latter point seems to be backed up by Hathaway's previous form, which saw him in April 2005 plead "no contest to one felony charge of mistreatment of an animal for the shooting death of Bambrick, a 26-year-old horse, to have sex with the animal".
Judge Lucci summed the matter up concisely with: "I'm a little surprised this issue hasn't been tackled before in another case." He then promised to render a decision before Hathaway's next court appearance on 1 December.
Hathaway faces a possible nine months' jail and a fine of up to $10,000 on the deer sex rap, but if convicted, "could serve a prison term of up to two years because of a previous conviction". ®

:yawn: sorry:rofl:
 

·
Still a Petrolhead but also like diesel
Joined
·
2,311 Posts
Discussion Starter #4
Ugh.

Made a bit of an ass of himself.

:crazy:

Whats more interesting is that there appears to be legislation about it!

Unlawful Accommodation of Donkeys Act 1837.

+ did you check out the receptionists name?

an April fool a month early .... maybe.:)
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
6,475 Posts
The defence lawyer of a Wisconsin man charged with having sex with a dead deer is claiming he's innocent of any wrongdoing - because a "crimes against sexual morality" statute prohibits sex with animals, but fails to mention carcasses, The Duluth News Tribune reports.
That'd be this story here would it?
Clicky

Strange that: Maybe it was only a certain state, but I know as part of Robert Schimmel's routine, he mentiones animal necrophilia as being a felony offence... and then goes on to question why they'd need a law to tell people that it was wrong. Obviously we have our answer now.

I have to admit that, after checking the date, I was buying the donkey thing until I read the receptionist's name. A classic wind-up. Probably someone who knew they were about to be fired slipping this one through the net before it happened.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
4,191 Posts
I see his solicitor is called Sharon Fitzhenry - I think its more a case of Thomas Fitzdonkey!!!!:d
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
40,429 Posts
Next time you stay in hotel,take a donkey with you and let me know if it works......like you've never tried breaking into a mini bar before.....without the donkey,obviously......although...;)
 
1 - 13 of 13 Posts
Top